Yeah… I go through life feeling like that sometimes. It can be annoying. But at least I have a yardstick to know exactly how annoying it is.
Last week I posted a review of an ink. An awesome ink — Iroshizuku Ku-jaku. I scanned in the paper I wrote the review on and was dismayed at the shittiness of how it looked on the screen. It was freakishly awful; the colors were drab and perhaps even made it to “so-so” instead of the vibrant awesomeness that was on my sheet of paper.
I henceforth ordered up a scanner calibration target from B&H. My scanning software, VueScan is nice enough to be able to scan in the industry standard images and calibrate the scanner to that. It arrived today! I did a happy-dance.
It’s nothing but a simple image on a piece of photographic paper:
The key is the file that you can download from the URL on the print. From there you can download the colors that are really on the card from a calibrated colorimeter. Every card is not calibrated, but the batch has enough consistency to ensure that it’s still accurate.
So, here’s the before and after:
Ick. Limp. Dull. Blah. You don’t get any of the cool green shading that is really on the paper. It looks like a flat blue ink with a tough of shading. If I wanted that I have inks that do exactly that.
Holding the paper up to my calibrated monitor is almost creepy; it looks the same. Exactly the same.
Here’s the full pages before and after:
If you have a calibrated monitor, you’ll see the exact color I have on my screen. If you don’t, well, you’ll still get a far better idea about the color than you would’ve otherwise.
– = –
For some reason I really love calibrated things. Why do I geek out on metrology (not meteorology) I don’t know. Traceable standards are cool.
I might be one of the few people that think that.
Why do you think I like my Fluke 87V? Mmmm… the sweet, sweet smell of calibration.